
“We have been staunch defenders of religious liberty in the past. We have a solemn duty to discharge that duty today,… for religious liberty is under attack, both at home and abroad.” More…

“We have been staunch defenders of religious liberty in the past. We have a solemn duty to discharge that duty today,… for religious liberty is under attack, both at home and abroad.” More…
If you want to learn many interesting things about sacred art, you have to visit this sight!
Wishing each and every one of you many joys and blessings this Easter Season!

Icons do not depict the actual event of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ directly. To quote from the book: The Incarnate God, Vol.2, (translated by Paul Meyendorff:) “Since about the 4th century, the Church has permitted only two icons of the Resurrection for liturgical use. These are the image of the holy women at the tomb, and the descent of Christ into Hell.”

As Western art and civilization moved towards subjective interpretation and self-expression, artists were encouraged to imagine moments not necessarily described in Scripture. These images can also, of course, be quite beautiful (think of the Sistine Chapel, for example), but are regarded as religious paintings and not as icons. Icons are liturgical art–theology in line and color, and not simply the product of imagination, emotions, and a skilled hand. They are steeped in Scripture…
View original post 97 more words

Atheism was once a practical mindset: living as though God did not exist. More…
This is the best Pro-Life Anti-Abortion video I’ve seen yet. Informative and powerful! Everyone needs to see this. Please, share.
Either we prevail in defending the right to life, or more innocent children will be left to die.
Watch this compelling video that reveals the true story of induced labor abortion and infanticide, so called “Live Birth Abortion.”
Visit Jill Stanek’s website at http://www.jillstanek.com/.
You might also be interested in reading:

“Not a good day in court for the government.”
Here is a really good analysis of yesterday’s hearings at the Supreme Court, followed a 2 part video synopsis of today’s hearings. More…
You might also be interested in reading:
- Cardinal Sean O’Malley: Massachusetts threatens to make assisted suicide legal
- Ethics of infanticide: Why should the baby die?
- Amelia’s Story: This is incredibly sad
Related:
Note: Whilst preparing this I looked for the article in the Journal of Medical Ethics. The paper on after-birth abortion referred to was by Australians Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva. Mysteriously, their article has ‘disappeared’ from the on-line version of said Journal.
+ Cardinal George Pell, Archbishop of Sydney
11 Mar 2012
There were 44 million abortions worldwide in 2008 according to last month’s issue of the Lancet.
It is a huge number; big enough to worry the editor, who declared that reducing abortion “is now an urgent priority for all countries”.
But not everyone agrees. Also last month in another medical journal, two Australian academics opened abortion’s last frontier with a discussion of the “ethics” of “after-birth abortion”.
The argument is simple enough. There are persons and “potential persons”, who are in fact “non-persons” and can be killed.
View original post 322 more words

Fr Joseph Tham, LC, MD, PhD
“Doctors said they could do no more and sent me home to die – I’m still waiting.”– Nicky Chapman
Suppose you delivered a baby with osteogenesis imperfecta, a rare condition with defect in collagen formation that makes the bones brittle and easy to fracture. In this case, the condition commonly known as brittle bone disease was so severe that at birth alone the infant suffered 50 fractures. The prognosis was very poor, and the baby would probably grow up blind, deaf and unable to communicate and with severely diminished mental functions. What would you recommend the parents to do? More…
Here is a brief report on yesterday’s hearings: More…